| Description |
Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) also known as circulation taxes are taxes levied on vehicles in order to use public roads. Circulation taxes are increasingly used as environmental policy instruments. |
| Mode Target |
Private vehicle fleet (new and second hand). |
| Behaviour Target |
Incentivise consumer purchasing of new cars towards smaller, more efficient cars. |
| Implementation Cost & Time |
Implementation Costs:
No specific data found on implementation cost.
UK estimates of foregone tax revenue and operational costs include:
Enforcement costs:
Implementation Time:
|
| Carbon Abatement |
Case Evidence:
-
Sweden: 2005 – 2006 average new car emissions reduction of 3.5% (198 – 191 gCO2/km).
-
UK: 1997 – 2005 avgerage new car emissions reduction of 10% (191 – 167 gCO2/km).
-
These emissions reductions were likely influenced by a package of policies targeting the new car market.
-
Therefore carbon savings cannot be solely attributed to Vehicle Excise Duty.
Modelled Evidence:
-
UK carbon savings of 0.07 – 0.42 MtC in 2010 and 0.3 - 1.6 MtC by 2020 from a 2006 baseline.
-
UK up to 25% CO2 savings achieving average new vehicle emissions of 100 gCO2/km by 2020 if the most efficient vehicle is purchased in class.
-
UK - due to rapid diesel take up from 2001 – 2020 approximately 7 MtC (0.4 MtC per year) savings.
-
EU could achieve up to 5% reductions of total CO2 with proper differentiation of VED and purchase taxes.
|
| Time of Carbon Savings |
- 10 – 15 years (if tax is only applied to new vehicle market)
|
| Ancillary Impacts |
-
Social Equity
- Diesel Emissions
|
| Case Evidence |
-
Overview of European Union countries and Asia (i.e. China, Japan, South Korea)
-
United Kingdom – Graduated Vehicle Excise Duty
-
Sweden - Environmental Vehicle Excise Duty
|
| Policy Synergies |
Highlighted synergies:
|
| Factors for Success |
|